eDockets
Docket Summary
***If sending a message to PUC staff, please note that as of March 29, 2021, all emails end with @puc.oregon.gov (instead of @state.or.us).
Docket No:
ADV 1156
Docket Name:
PGE SCHEDULE 300 ADVICE NO. 20-20 PULSE OUTPUT METERING REINSTATED
Submit Public Comment
Subject Company:
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
This filing, Portland General Electric (PGE) Advice No. 20-20, Pulse Output Metering, Schedule 300, reinstates Pulse Output Metering in Schedule 300. which was inadvertently removed from Schedule 300 in its UE 335 general rate case when meter rentals...
Filing Date:
7/22/2020
Advice No:
20-20
Public Mtg:
9/8/2020
Effective:
9/9/2020
Expiration:
Status:
ALLOWED
Case Manager:
Mitch Moore
Phone:
971-375-5094
Email:
mitch.moore@puc.oregon.gov
Staff Contact:
CURTIS DLOUHY
Phone:
503-510-3350
Email:
curtis.dlouhy@puc.oregon.gov
If you experience problems with the
above
'Email Service List' links,
please try one of these:
Service List Popup (semi-colon delimited)
Service List Popup (comma delimited)
General information about Tariff Filings.
ACTIONS
SERVICE LIST
SCHEDULE
Public Comments
Sort By Date
Sort By Type
Date:
9/8/2020
Action:
ALLOWED (APPROVED) UTILITY FILING
Description
Letter sent
Date:
9/2/2020
Action:
STAFF REPORT
Description
Staff Report for the September 8, 2020 Public Meeting, Item CA4, filed by Curtis Dlouhy and Mitchell Moore.
Date:
8/4/2020
Action:
REPLACEMENT SHEETS, ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
Description
PGE Supplemental Filing of Advice No. 20-20, Pulse Output Metering, to clarify that the reinstatement of the Pulse Output Metering charges in Schedule 300 are for installation costs.
Date:
7/22/2020
Action:
INITIAL UTILITY FILING
Description
This filing, Portland General Electric (PGE) Advice No. 20-20, Pulse Output Metering, Schedule 300, reinstates Pulse Output Metering in Schedule 300. which was inadvertently removed from Schedule 300 in its UE 335 general rate case when meter rentals were removed. This filing reinstates pulse output metering and includes two metering options and prices associated with those options. The prevalent option results in a lower charge than the previously existing $500 charge. The additional option is more expensive, reflecting a higher equipment cost for advanced power quality data needs.
New Search