ORDER NO. 98-532

ENTERED DEC 17 1998

This is an electronic copy. Appendices and footnotes may not appear.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

OF OREGON

ARB 87

In the Matter of the Interconnection and Service Resale Agreement between Northpoint Communications, Inc., and U S WEST Communications, Inc., Submitted for Commission Approval Pursuant to Section 252 (e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. )

)

) ORDER

 DISPOSITION: AMENDED AMENDMENT APPROVED

 On September 24, 1998, Northpoint Communications, Inc., and U S WEST Communications, Inc., filed with the Public Utility Commission of Oregon (Commission), a negotiated interconnection agreement. On November 6, 1998, the parties filed a fully executed amendment to the agreement. The parties seek approval of the amended agreement under Section 252(e)(2) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

Under the Act, the Commission must approve or reject an agreement reached through voluntary negotiation within 90 days of filing. The Commission may reject an agreement only if it finds that:

the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or

the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

The Commission provided notice of the request for approval and an opportunity to comment to a list of persons who have participated in arbitrations under the Act. Comments were filed by the PUC Staff.

Staff concluded that the amended agreement does not appear to discriminate against telecommunications carriers who are not parties to the agreement and does not appear to be inconsistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

OPINION

The Commission has reviewed the amended agreement and the comments. We conclude that there is no basis under the Act to reject the amended agreement. No participant in the proceeding has requested that the amended agreement be rejected or has presented any reason for rejection. We conclude that the amended agreement should be approved.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no basis for finding that the amended agreement discriminates against any telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement.

There is no basis for finding that implementation of the amended agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

The amended agreement should be approved.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the amended agreement between Northpoint Communications, Inc., and U S WEST Communications, Inc., is approved.

Made, entered, and effective ________________________.

______________________________

Ron Eachus

Chairman

____________________________

Roger Hamilton

Commissioner

____________________________

Joan H. Smith

Commissioner

 A party may request rehearing or reconsideration of this order pursuant to ORS 756.561. A request for rehearing or reconsideration must be filed with the Commission within 60 days of the date of service of this order. The request must comply with the requirements in OAR 860-014-0095. A copy of any such request must also be served on each party to the proceeding as provided by OAR 860-013-0070(2). A party may appeal this order to a court pursuant to applicable law.