ORDER NO. 98-007

ENTERED JAN 06 1998

This is an electronic copy. Appendices may not be included.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

OF OREGON

CP 374

DISPOSITION: APPLICATION GRANTED

Note: By issuing this certificate, the Commission makes no endorsement or certification regarding the certificate holder’s rates or service.

The Application

On September 26, 1997, Accurate Communications, Inc., (applicant) filed with the Commission an application for certification to provide telecommunications service in Oregon as a competitive provider. Applicant seeks authority to provide local exchange telecommunications service in areas coextensive with local exchanges of U S WEST Communications, Inc. (USWC), GTE Northwest Incorporated (GTE), PTI Communications, Inc. (PTI), and United Telephone Company of the Northwest, d.b.a. Sprint (United).

The local exchanges of USWC encompassed by the application are listed in Appendix A to this order. The local exchanges of GTE encompassed by the application are listed in Appendix B to this order. The local exchanges of PTI encompassed by the application are listed in Appendix C to this order. The local exchanges of United encompassed by the application are listed in Appendix D to this order.

Applicant seeks authority to provide local dedicated transmission (non-switched, private line) service in exchanges now served by USWC, GTE, PTI, and United. Applicant also seeks authority to provide interexchange dedicated transmission service statewide in Oregon. Applicant will operate as a facilities based provider and a reseller of telecommunications service. Applicant may purchase services for resale from the incumbent local exchange carriers or from other certified competitive providers.

Operator services are not part of dedicated transmission service, and applicant will not provide operator services. A statement of compliance with ORS 759.690 and OAR 860-032-0005 (regarding operator services) was included in the application.

The Commission served notice of the application on the Commission’s telecommunications mailing list October 13, 1997. The Commission did not receive any protests. However, USWC, GTE, PTI, and United were considered parties to this proceeding.

On November 13, 1997, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with the Commission issued a ruling that adopted procedures for the processing of this docket. The ALJ set forth a procedural schedule.

On December 4, 1997, the Commission Staff (Staff) distributed a proposed order for review by the parties. No party filed exceptions to the proposed order.

The Commission has reviewed the proposed order and the record in this matter. Based on a preponderance of the evidence, the Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Applicable Law

Applications to provide telecommunications service and for classification as a competitive telecommunications services provider are filed pursuant to ORS 759.020. ORS 759.020 provides that:

(1) No person [or] corporation * * * shall provide intrastate telecommunications service on a for-hire basis without a certificate of authority issued by the commission under this section.

* * * * *

(5) The commission may classify a successful applicant for a certificate as a * * * competitive telecommunications services provider. If the commission finds that a successful applicant for a certificate has demonstrated that its customers or those proposed to become customers have reasonably available alternatives, the commission shall classify the applicant as a competitive telecommunications services provider[.] For purposes of this section, in determining whether there are reasonably available alternatives, the commission shall consider:

(a) The extent to which services are available from alternative providers in the relevant market.

(b) The extent to which services of alternative providers are functionally equivalent or substitutable at comparable rates, terms, and conditions.

(c) Existing economic or regulatory barriers to entry.

(d) Any other factors deemed relevant by the commission.

Applications to provide local exchange (intraexchange) telecommunications services are reviewed pursuant to ORS 759.050, the "competitive zone law." Under ORS 759.050(2)(a), the Commission may:

certify one or more persons, including another telecommunications utility, to provide local exchange telecommunications service within the local exchange telecommunications service area of a certified telecommunications utility, if the commission determines that such authorization would be in the public interest. For the purpose of determining whether such authorization would be in the public interest, the commission shall consider:

(A) The effect on rates for local exchange telecommunications service customers both within and outside the competitive zone.

(B) The effect on competition in the local exchange telecommunications service area.

(C) The effect on access by customers to high quality innovative telecommunications service in the local exchange telecommunications service area.

(D) Any other facts the commission considers relevant.

Under ORS 759.050(2)(b), the Commission shall:

[u]pon certification of a telecommunications provider under paragraph (a) of this subsection, establish a competitive zone defined by the services to be provided by the telecommunications provider and the geographic area to be served by the telecommunications provider.

Under ORS 759.050(2)(c), the Commission may:

impose reasonable conditions upon the authority of [the applicant] to provide competitive zone service within the competitive zone * * * at the time of certification of a telecommunications provider, or thereafter.

Subsection (5)(a) of ORS 759.050 provides that:

unless the commission determines that it is not in the public interest at the time a competitive zone is created, upon designation of a competitive zone, price changes, service variations, and modifications of competitive zone services offered by a telecommunications utility in the zone shall not be subject to [the notice, hearing and tariff suspension procedures in] ORS 759.180 to ORS 759.190, and at the telecommunications utility’s discretion, such changes may be made effective upon filing with the commission.

OAR 860-032-0015(1) authorizes the Commission to suspend or cancel the certificate if the Commission finds that (a) the holder made misrepresentations when it filed the application, or (b) the applicant fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the certificate.

Designation as a Competitive Provider

Applicant has met the requirements for classification as a competitive telecommunications services provider. Applicant’s customers or those proposed to become customers have reasonably available alternatives. The incumbent telecommunications utilities, USWC, GTE, PTI, and United provide the same or similar local exchange services in the local service area requested by applicant. AT&T, MCI, and Sprint provide the same or similar interexchange services as the applicant proposes to provide. Subscribers to applicant’s services can buy comparable services at comparable rates from other vendors. Economic and regulatory barriers to entry are relatively low.

Conditions of the Certificate

The Commission first applied the competitive zone law, ORS 759.050, in dockets CP 1, CP 14, and CP 15. After full evidentiary hearings and consideration of the public interest criteria set forth in ORS 759.050(2)(a), the Commission designated three competitive providers of switched local exchange services as alternate exchange carriers (AECs) in the Portland metropolitan area. See Order No. 96-021. The Commission subsequently applied those findings and conclusions to dockets CP 132, CP 139, and CP 149, and certified two AECs to provide switched local exchange services in areas located throughout the state.

The Commission takes official notice of the record in dockets CP 1, CP 14, and CP 15. In Order No. 96-021, the Commission established conditions applicable to AEC certificates. Since applicant, Accurate Communications, Inc., proposes to offer local exchange services, it seeks certification as an AEC. Pursuant to ORS 759.050(2)(c) and Order No. 96-021, applicant as an AEC shall comply with the following conditions:

1. Applicant shall terminate all intrastate traffic originating on the networks of other telecommunications service providers that have been issued a certificate of authority by the Commission.

2. Whenever applicant terminates intrastate long distance traffic directly or indirectly from interexchange carriers or from its own toll network to its end user customers, applicant shall contribute to the Oregon Customer Access Fund (OCAF), or its equivalent, in accordance with provisions of the Oregon Customer Access Plan (OCAP) or any successor plan approved by the Commission. Applicant shall contribute using rates approved by the Commission on intrastate terminating carrier common line access minutes, or on any other basis determined by the Commission. Applicant may not participate in (i.e., receive money from) pooling arrangements established under the OCAP or any successor plan unless authorized by the Commission.

3. Applicant shall comply with the Oregon Exchange Carrier Association’s (OECA) informational and operational needs as specified by the OCAP or any successor plan approved by the Commission.

4. Access to E-911 service is not part of dedicated transmission service.

5. Applicant shall not take any action that impairs the ability of other certified telecommunications service providers to meet service standards specified by the Commission.

6. At the request of the Commission, applicant shall conduct and submit to the Commission traffic studies regarding traffic exchanged with telecommunications services providers and other entities designated by the Commission.

7. For purposes of distinguishing between local and toll calling, applicant shall adhere to local exchange boundaries and Extended Area Service (EAS) routes established by the Commission. Applicant shall not establish an EAS route from a given local exchange beyond the EAS area for that exchange.

8. Applicant shall comply with universal service requirements as determined by the Commission.

9. Unless otherwise provided pursuant to an interconnection agreement adopted by the Commission pursuant to Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, applicant shall enter into interconnection agreements with telecommunications utilities for exchange of local and EAS traffic, ancillary services (i.e., directory listings, directory assistance, 911 arrangements, mutual repair referral) and other interconnection matters in accordance with requirements the Commission established in Order No. 96-021 as otherwise modified by the Commission.

10. If applicant provides services to a subscriber who, in turn, resells the services, including operator services, then applicant and the subscriber must comply with ORS. 759.690 and OAR 860-032-0005.

Public Interest

The Commission’s Findings and Decisions in dockets CP 1, CP 14, and CP 15, Order No. 96-021 at pages 6 - 21, entered pursuant to ORS 759.050(2)(a)(A)-(C), are adopted. Based on a review of those findings, as well as information contained in the application, the Commission concludes that it is in the public interest to grant the application of Accurate Communications, Inc., to provide local exchange telecommunications services as a competitive telecommunications provider in the exchanges listed in Appendices A, B, C, and D.

Competitive Zones

The exchanges listed in Appendices A, B, C, and D to this order are designated competitive zones pursuant to ORS 759.050(2)(b).

Pricing Flexibility

The Commission’s Findings and Decisions in dockets CP 1, CP 14, and CP 15, Order No. 96-021 at pages 82 and 83, entered pursuant to ORS 759.050(5)(a)-(d), are adopted. Accordingly, USWC will gain pricing flexibility in an exchange listed in Appendix A when:

1. Applicant, or an authorized AEC, has received a certificate of authority to provide local exchange service.

2. USWC files a tariff which satisfies the Commission’s requirements regarding the provision of interim number portability, as set forth in Order No. 96-021, and the Commission approves the tariff. USWC has satisfied this requirement. See Order No. 96-277.

3. Staff notifies the Commission that a mutual exchange of traffic exists between USWC and an authorized AEC, including but not limited to, applicant. If Staff previously provided the required notice regarding an exchange, no additional notice is required for that exchange.

(a) As used in paragraph 3 above, "mutual exchange of traffic" means a mutual exchange of traffic between USWC and the AEC within each exchange on an exchange-by-exchange basis. For example, if there is a mutual exchange of traffic in the Bend exchange, USWC would get pricing flexibility in the Bend exchange only.

(b) As used in paragraph 3 above, for an AEC who is a reseller (i.e., an AEC does not use its own lines or switches to provide the particular service at issue), a "mutual exchange of traffic" exists when the AEC orders and receives one service, at a wholesale rate, from the LEC for resale pursuant to a certificate granted under ORS 759.050.

Similarly, GTE will gain pricing flexibility in an exchange listed in Appendix B when:

1. Applicant, or an authorized AEC, has received a certificate of authority to provide local exchange service.

2. GTE files a tariff which satisfies the Commission’s requirements regarding the provision of interim number portability, as set forth in Order No. 96-021, and the Commission approves the tariff. GTE has satisfied this requirement. See Order No. 96-278.

3. Staff notifies the Commission that a mutual exchange of traffic exists between GTE and an authorized AEC, including but not limited to, applicant. If Staff previously provided the required notice regarding an exchange, no additional notice is required for that exchange. The definitions in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) above, also apply here.

Similarly, PTI will gain pricing flexibility in an exchange listed in Appendix C when:

1. Applicant, or an authorized AEC, has received a certificate of authority to provide local exchange service.

2. PTI files a tariff which satisfies the Commission’s requirements regarding the provision of interim number portability, as set forth in Order No. 96-021, and the Commission approves the tariff.

3. Staff notifies the Commission that a mutual exchange of traffic exists between PTI and an authorized AEC, including but not limited to, applicant. If Staff previously provided the required notice regarding an exchange, no additional notice is required for that exchange. The definitions in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) above, also apply here.

Similarly, United will gain pricing flexibility in an exchange listed in Appendix D when:

1. Applicant, or an authorized AEC, has received a certificate of authority to provide local exchange service.

2. United files a tariff which satisfies the Commission’s requirements regarding the provision of interim number portability, as set forth in Order No. 96-021, and the Commission approves the tariff.

3. Staff notifies the Commission that a mutual exchange of traffic exists between United and an authorized AEC, including but not limited to, applicant. If Staff previously provided the required notice regarding an exchange, no additional notice is required for that exchange. The definitions in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) above, also apply here.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The application of Accurate Communications, Inc., to provide the local exchange dedicated transmission service and interexchange dedicated transmission service described in the application is in the public interest and is granted with conditions described in this order.

2. Applicant is designated as a competitive telecommunications provider for intraexchange service in the exchanges listed in Appendices A, B, C, and D, and for interexchange service statewide in Oregon.

3. The local exchanges of USWC listed in Appendix A, those of GTE listed in Appendix B, those of PTI listed in Appendix C, and those of United listed in Appendix D are designated as competitive zones.

4. USWC, GTE, PTI, and United shall receive pricing flexibility for dedicated transmission service on an exchange-by-exchange basis as set forth in this order.

5. Pursuant to ORS 759.050(2)(c), applicant shall comply with Commission imposed universal service requirements as a condition of authority to provide local exchange service.

Made, entered, and effective _________________.

A party may request rehearing or reconsideration of this order pursuant to ORS 756.561. A request for rehearing or reconsideration must be filed with the Commission within 60 days of the date of service of this order. The request must comply with the requirements in OAR 860-014-0095. A copy of any such request must also be served on each party to the proceeding as provided by OAR 860-013-0070(2). A party may appeal this order to a court pursuant to ORS 756.580.

APPENDIX A

CP 374

EXCHANGES OF U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

ENCOMPASSED BY THE APPLICATION

Albany

Ashland

Astoria

Athena/Weston

Baker

Bend

Blue River

Burlington

Camp Sherman

Cannon Beach

Central Point

Corvallis

Cottage Grove

Culver

Dallas

Eugene/Springfield

Falls City

Florence

Gold Hill

Grants Pass

Harrisburg

Hermiston

Independence/Monmouth

Jacksonville

Jefferson

Junction City

Klamath Falls

Lake Oswego

Lapine

Leaburg

Lowell

Madras

Mapleton

Marcola

Medford

Milton-Freewater

Newport

North Plains

Oak Grove/Milwaukie

Oakland/Sutherlin

Oakridge

Oregon City

Pendleton

Phoenix/Talent

Portland

Prineville

Rainier

Redmond

Rogue River

Roseburg

St. Helens

Salem

Seaside

Siletz

Sisters

Stanfield

Sumpter

Toledo

Umatilla

Veneta

Walla Walla

Warrenton

Westport

Woodburn/Hubbard

APPENDIX B

CP 374

EXCHANGES OF GTE NORTHWEST INCORPORATED

ENCOMPASSED BY THE APPLICATION

Amity

Aumsville/Turner

Bandon

Beaverton

Brookings

Clatskanie

Coos Bay/North Bend

Coquille

Cove

Dayton

Detroit

Elgin

Enterprise

Forest Grove

Gold Beach

Grand Island

Gresham

Hillsboro

Hoodland

Imbler

Joseph

La Grande

Lakeside

Langlois

Lostine

McMinnville

Mill City

Murphy/Provolt

Myrtle Point

Newberg

Port Orford

Powers

Reedsport

Sandy

Scholls

Sherwood

Silverton

Stafford

Sunnyside

Tigard

Union

Vernonia

Wallowa

Yamhill

APPENDIX C

CP 374

EXCHANGES OF PTI COMMUNICATIONS

ENCOMPASSED BY THE APPLICATION

Aurora

Bly

Boardman

Bonanza

Brownsville

Burns

Camas Valley

Charbonneau

Chemult

Chiloquin

Creswell

Depoe Bay

Drain

Durkee

Echo

Fort Klamath

Fossil

Gilchrist

Gleneden Beach

Glide

Government Camp

Heppner

Huntington

Ione

Jewell

John Day

Knappa

Lakeview

Lebanon

Lexington

Long Creek

Malin

Maupin

Merrill

Mitchell

Monument

North Harney

North Powder

North Umpqua

Paisley

Paulina

Pilot Rock

Pine Grove

Rocky Point

Scappoose

Seneca

Shedd

Silver Lake

South Harney

Sprague River

Spray

Starkey

Sweet Home

Tygh Valley

Ukiah

Wamic

Yoncalla

APPENDIX D

CP 374

EXCHANGES OF UNITED TELEPHONE OF THE NORTHWEST

ENCOMPASSED BY THE APPLICATION

Arlington

Bay City

Beaver

Butte Falls

Carlton

Cascade Locks

Cloverdale

Crater Lake

Diamond Lake

Fish Lake

Garibaldi

Grand Ronde

Grass Valley

Hood River

Lincoln City

Moro

Mosier

Odell

Pacific City

Parkdale

Prospect

Rockaway

Rufus

Shady Cove

Sheridan

The Dalles

Tillamook

Wasco

White City

Willamina