ORDER NO. 97-091

ENTERED MAR 5 1997

This is an electronic copy.

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

OF OREGON

CP 212

In the Matter of the Application of AMERICAN INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY for a Certificate of Authority to Provide Telecommunications Services in Oregon and Classification as a Competitive Provider. )
)
) ORDER
)
)

DISPOSITION: APPLICATION GRANTED

Note: By issuing this certificate, the Commission makes no endorsement or certification regarding the certificate holder’s rates or service.

The Application

On September 5, 1996, Diversified Specialty Communications, Inc. filed with the Commission an application for certification to provide telecommunications service in Oregon as a competitive provider. On November 11, 1996, the company filed a letter notifying the Commission that the company name was changed to American Independent Telephone Company (applicant). Applicant seeks authority to provide telecom-munications service in areas of Wallowa County which are currently located outside of existing local exchange boundaries of incumbent local exchange companies. Applicant will use BETRS radio frequency UHF and VHF radios that are able to provide both voice and fax transmission. Applicant will contract with existing telephone companies to provide dial tone and associated switching, operator services, 911 service, and long distance equal access.

The Commission served notice of the application on the Commission’s telecommunications mailing list on September 12, 1996. The Commission received a protest from U S WEST Communications, Inc. (USWC).

On December 19, 1996, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with the Commission issued a ruling that adopted procedures for the processing of this docket. The ALJ also granted all petitions to intervene and set forth a procedural schedule.

On January 9, 1997, the Commission Staff (Staff) distributed a proposed order for review by the parties. USWC filed exceptions to the proposed order. On February 12, 1997, Staff filed a reply, which included revisions to the proposed order.

The Commission has reviewed the proposed order, exceptions, reply, and the record in this matter. Based on a preponderance of the evidence, the Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Applicable Law

Applications to provide telecommunications service and for classification as a competitive telecommunications services provider are filed pursuant to ORS 759.020. ORS 759.020 provides that:

(1) No person [or] corporation * * * shall provide intrastate telecommunications service on a for-hire basis without a certificate of authority issued by the commission under this section.

* * * * *

(5) The commission may classify a successful applicant for a certificate as a * * * competitive telecommunications services provider. If the commission finds that a successful applicant for a certificate has demonstrated that its customers or those proposed to become customers have reasonably available alternatives, the commission shall classify the applicant as a competitive telecommunications services provider[.] For purposes of this section, in determining whether there are reasonably available alternatives, the commission shall consider:

(a) The extent to which services are available from alternative providers in the relevant market.

(b) The extent to which services of alternative providers are functionally equivalent or substitutable at comparable rates, terms, and conditions.

(c) Existing economic or regulatory barriers to entry.

(d) Any other factors deemed relevant by the commission.

OAR 860-32-015(1) authorizes the Commission to suspend or cancel the certificate if the Commission finds that (a) the holder made misrepresentations when it filed the application, or (b) the applicant fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the certificate.

Designation as a Competitive Provider

Applicant has met the requirements for classification as a competitive telecommunications services provider. Applicant’s customers or those proposed to become customers have reasonably available alternatives. The incumbent telecom-munications utilities provide, or could provide the same or similar local exchange services in the service area requested by applicant. Subscribers to applicant’s services can buy comparable services at comparable rates from other vendors. Economic and regulatory barriers to entry are relatively low.

Conditions of the Certificate

Applicant shall comply with the following conditions:

1. Applicant shall terminate all intrastate traffic originating on the networks of other telecommunications services providers that have been issued a certificate of authority by the Commission.

2. Whenever applicant terminates intrastate long distance traffic directly or indirectly from interexchange carriers or from its own toll network to its end user customers, applicant shall contribute to the Oregon Customer Access Fund (OCAF), or its equivalent, in accordance with provisions of the Oregon Customer Access Plan (OCAP) or any successor plan approved by the Commission. Applicant shall contribute using rates approved by the Commission on intrastate terminating carrier common line access minutes, or on any other basis determined by the Commission. Applicant may not participate in (i.e., receive money from) pooling arrangements established under the OCAP or any successor plan unless authorized by the Commission.

3. Applicant shall comply with the Oregon Exchange Carrier Association’s (OECA) informational and operational needs as specified by the OCAP or any successor plan approved by the Commission.

4. Applicant shall offer E-911 service. Applicant has primary responsibility to work with the E-911 agencies to make certain that all users of their services have access to the emergency system. Applicant will deliver or arrange to have delivered to the correct 911 Controlling Office its customers’ voice and dialable Automatic Number Identification (ANI) telephone numbers so the lead 911 telecommunications services provider can deliver the 911 call to the correct Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). Applicant agrees to work with each 911 district and lead 911 telecommunications services provider to develop database comparison procedures to match applicant’s customer addresses to the 911 district’s Master Street Address Guide in order to obtain the correct Emergency Service Number ("ESN") for each address. Applicant agrees to provide the lead 911 telecommunications services provider with daily updates of new customers, moves, and changes with the corresponding correct ESN for each.

5. Applicant shall not take any action that impairs the ability of other certified telecommunications services providers to meet service standards specified by the Commission.

6. At the request of the Commission, applicant shall conduct and submit to the Commission traffic studies regarding traffic exchanged with telecommunications services providers and other entities designated by the Commission.

7. For purposes of distinguishing between local and toll calling, applicant shall adhere to local exchange boundaries and Extended Area Service (EAS) routes established by the Commission. Applicant’s customers shall be considered part of the exchange from which the customer receives dial tone.

8. Applicant shall comply with universal service requirements as determined by the Commission.

9. Unless otherwise provided pursuant to an interconnection agreement adopted by the Commission pursuant to Section 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, applicant shall enter into interconnection agreements with telecommunications utilities for exchange of local and EAS traffic, ancillary services (i.e., directory listings, directory assistance, 911 arrangements, mutual repair referral) and other interconnection matters in accordance with requirements the Commission established in Order No. 96-021 as otherwise modified by the Commission.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The application of American Independent Telephone Company to provide the telecommunications services described in the application is in the public interest and is granted with conditions described in this order.

2. Applicant is designated as a competitive telecommunications services provider.

3. Pursuant to ORS 759.050(2)(c), applicant shall comply with Commission imposed universal service requirements as a condition of authority to provide local exchange service.

Made, entered, and effective _________________.

________________________

Roger Hamilton

Chairman

________________________

Ron Eachus

Commissioner

 

________________________

Joan H. Smith

Commissioner

A party may request rehearing or reconsideration of this order pursuant to ORS 756.561. A request for rehearing or reconsideration must be filed with the Commission within 60 days of the date of service of this order. The request must comply with the requirements in OAR 860-014-0095. A copy of any such request must also be served on each party to the proceeding as provided by OAR 860-013-0070(2). A party may appeal this order to a court pursuant to ORS 756.580.