ORDER NO. 96-223

 

ENTERED AUG 21 1996

THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC COPY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

 

OF OREGON

 

ARB 1

 

 

In the Matter of the Petition of MFS Communications Company, Inc., for Arbitration of Interconnection Rates, Terms, and Conditions Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. Sec. 252(B) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. )

)

) PROTECTIVE

) ORDER

)

)

 

On June 24, 1996, MFS Communications Company filed a motion in its Petition for a Standard Protective Order to restrict disclosure of certain information it claims is confidential. With the motion, MFS set forth facts intending to show that good cause exists to issue a protective order.

 

MFS seeks protection of its trade secrets and other confidential information, the disclosure of which would cause serious and irreparable injury to MFS. The information could be used by MFS’ competitors to their commercial advantage and to the commercial disadvantage of MFS, causing substantial monetary loss to MFS and, ultimately, the loss of competitive choices for customers.

 

MFS has made a prima facie showing of good cause to issue a protective order in this proceeding. This protective order and the information protected by it is subject to all the provisions set forth in Appendix A. Parties agreeing to be bound by the terms of the protective order shall sign the signatory page of Appendix B.

NOTICE

 

Any party in this proceeding may appeal to the Commission for relief from any term of this Protective Order by filing a complaint with the Commission as provided in OAR 860-13-015. Parties benefiting from this Protective Order may respond as provided by Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. For good cause shown, the Commission may establish expedited procedures for ruling on any such appeal.

 

 

ORDER

 

IT IS ORDERED that the Standard Protective Order, attached as Appendix "A," shall govern disclosure of confidential information in this case.

 

Made, entered, and effective ________________________________, pursuant to OAR 860-12-035(1)(k).

 

 

  ___________________________

Thomas G. Barkin

Arbitrator

   

 

This order may be appealed to the Commission pursuant to OAR 860-14-091. The appeal should be in the form of a motion. See OAR 860-13-031.